Re: gEDA-dev: gnetlist as one way path?

[Ales Hvezda <ahvezda-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org>]

[snip]
>I wasn't seeking too, nor do I have any desire too. By making my changes
>available I only sought to allow others who are interested in
>improvements access to my work. Do you wish me to not make my code
>available? Would you like me to move on and not participate?

	Gah!  Okay, so this whole thread has gone to hell.  I'm sorry
I caused this whole mess.

	My only point is that suddenly changing a working and stable
code base to something completely brand new (that is, taking your code
base and suddenly making mainstream gEDA/gaf) is highly risky and will
most likely upset existing users (that don't expect the rug to change
under them so suddenly).  Maybe this was not your intention, but how
should I have interpreted the following exchange then?

	>
	>
	> Sounds very nice. What would it take to get your version of libgeda  
	> into the gEDA mainstream?
	>
	>  	 
	Well, I was shooting for converging in libeda version 3.


Thanks,
-Ales



_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev