Re: gEDA-dev: State of the symbols library

[Stuart Brorson <sdb-at-NOSPAMcloud9_dot_net>]

I'll add my $0.02 here.

You can have a pure graphical with pins in the case that you want to
create a hierarchical design:  The graphical is just a  top-level
symbol indicating a lower-level schematic or subsection of a whole 
design.  If you do "down" on the graphical, then you end up opening up
the lower level.

You need pins on the top-level graphical to allow connection of nets
which need to show up on the lower level.

Stuart


On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, evan foss wrote:

> Ok but why is it valid?
>
> -- 
> http://www.coe.neu.edu/~efoss/
> http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-dev mailing list
> geda-dev@moria.seul.org
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
>


_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev