On Sunday 01 July 2007 10:48:26 Patrick Bernaud wrote: > Peter TB Brett writes: > > On Sunday 01 July 2007 09:35:53 Patrick Bernaud wrote: > > > Peter TB Brett writes: > > > > [...] > > > > of messy. Patrick Bernaud had a really good idea which he > > > > submitted a sort-of-broken patch to implement: use an 2x2 matrix to > > > > represent > > > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > > > I am curious about what you mean by 'sort-of-broken'. > > > > Didn't apply cleanly. Apart from that, it was great! > > Interesting. I never heard any complains of this type before. Even > though, if I remember correctly, I ported it to CVS HEAD to ease > review and testing. Well, there were ChangeLog conflicts (but there always are). I meant it didn't apply cleanly _now_, in that changes since the original patch base have made it out of date. It mostly seems to be Peter C's noscreen work which conflicts. Peter -- Peter Brett Electronic Systems Engineer Integral Informatics Ltd
This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list geda-dev@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev