Re: gEDA-dev: referencing or embedding symbols?

[DJ Delorie <dj-at-NOSPAMdelorie_dot_com>]

> Question for the list, how would you feel if gschem's default storage
> mechanism changed from referencing to embedding placed symbols?  Instead of
> just referencing the symbols, the symbols would be automatically embedded
> into the schematic.

People already complain about how hard it is to replace footprints in
PCB, I'd think the same time of problems would crop up in gschem.  Me,
I don't mind if gschem embeds them in a *project*, but not individual
symbols.  I do occasionally edit symbols in my local library and
expect them to be updated in the schematics, although I also embed
them all when the design is vetted.


_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev