Re: gEDA-dev: Broken slotting

[Peter Clifton <pcjc2-at-NOSPAMcam_dot_ac_dot_uk>]

On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:56 -0400, John Doty wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 8:07 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> 
> > I should be able to write a fix over the next day or so.
> >
> > Thanks for confirming the desired behaviour. I was (and still am) a
> > little concerned about not having any "contractual" guarantee that  
> > every
> > symbol will have pinseq attributes start at "1" and end at the  
> > number of
> > pins on the device. Perhaps this is implied though, by the nature  
> > of the
> > slotdef attribute.
> 
> Can we think this out a little better? Pinseq is a confusing  
> attribute, made more confusing by its overloading:

This was kind-of where I was going with the "is it the right solution"
question. Clearly we want to fix the bug, but I guess this is something
we should think about long-term.

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)



_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev