Re: gEDA-dev: New gerbv revision ready for testing

[Dan McMahill <dan-at-NOSPAMmcmahill_dot_net>]

Stuart Brorson wrote:

> Therefore, I'm making the (possibly unpopular) decision to require
> that patches be submitted only against the STABLE_1_X_branch as we
> move forward.  The reason is that none of the maintainers have the
> time or global view required to sort out all the conflicts which have
> crept into the development branches.  Over the course of time I intend
> to clean out the many different branches which are currently in the
> gerbv tree.
> 
> Accordingly, if you have previously submitted a patch, please update
> from cvs (per above) and rebase your patch off of the
> STABLE_1_X_branch and resubmit.  This will help everybody keep the
> gerbv project on the rails.
> 
> If you are badly burned by this policy, please feel free to resolve
> all the conflicts between the stable branch and the development branch
> yourself, and submit patches.  You may also e-mail me with any other
> idea to support both me and your code.  I am not trying to
> disenfranchise anybody, or throw away anybody's work, but OTOH I do
> not have the time or capacity to sort the different branches out
> myself, and therefore need your support to keep gerbv moving forward.

Ok, I did just that.  I applied all the patches that you committed to 
the STABLE_1_x_branch branch to the trunk just now.  They only took some 
minor massaging.  I figured I complained enough earlier about this I'd 
better put up or shut up ;)

-Dan




_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev