[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-dev: Wikipedia entry vs. Windows port
On Nov 21 2008, Peter C.J. Clifton wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
> The gEDA wikipedia entry (which could do with some general polish IMO),
> had a rather negative portrayal of the possibility of a Windows port for
> the suite. More than that, it linked directly to somewhat of a flame-ware
> in the email archives, which alluded to Windows users being a bunch of
> n00bs.
>
>I've now edited this (originally added anonymously by someone who wasn't
>logged in), and I hope that I've fairly put across the gEDA project's
>position on the matter.
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GEDA&diff=253196488&oldid=247881309
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEDA
>
>PS.. does anyone know if we can rename the GEDA part of that URL to "gEDA"?
Speaking of edits, I've added a comment to the discussion page for the EDA
article, proposing that more neutral screen-shots be used (represent
different software, or remove captions identifying them etc..)
See the bottom of this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Electronic_design_automation
_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev