[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-dev: Wikipedia entry vs. Windows port



On Nov 21 2008, Peter C.J. Clifton wrote:

>Hi guys,
>
> The gEDA wikipedia entry (which could do with some general polish IMO), 
> had a rather negative portrayal of the possibility of a Windows port for 
> the suite. More than that, it linked directly to somewhat of a flame-ware 
> in the email archives, which alluded to Windows users being a bunch of 
> n00bs.
>
>I've now edited this (originally added anonymously by someone who wasn't 
>logged in), and I hope that I've fairly put across the gEDA project's 
>position on the matter.
>
>  
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GEDA&diff=253196488&oldid=247881309 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEDA
>
>PS.. does anyone know if we can rename the GEDA part of that URL to "gEDA"?

Speaking of edits, I've added a comment to the discussion page for the EDA 
article, proposing that more neutral screen-shots be used (represent 
different software, or remove captions identifying them etc..)

See the bottom of this page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Electronic_design_automation



_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev