[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA: Dumb (g)netlist question.
On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 11:29:51PM -0500, Andrew M. Dyer wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Ales Hvezda wrote:
> > So how should gnetlist handle the assigning of net names to nets
> > which are explicity assigned and those which are created by the
> > net= attribute? (Assuming you connect these nets together).
> > Or another way to look at it is assigning two different net
> > names to the same net. Should this be allowed?
> >
>
> I believe the simple case you have described should be an error, flagged,
> and ask the user for resolution. I always strive to keep net names the
> same across schematics and heirarchical boundries, so a one name per net
> rule is fine with me. The only place I find this a pain is integrating
> schematics from several sources, and there the problem can usually be
> solved by judicious use of heirarchy.
I agree, but I also think that you shouldn't have to name the net
connecting your inverter input to VCC "+5V". To me this suggests
that the handling of the VCC symbol may be incorrect.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt Mobile: +61 412 011 176 hamish@rising.com.au
Rising Software Australia Pty. Ltd. http://www.risingsoftware.com/
Phone: +61 3 9894 4788 Fax: +61 3 9894 3362 USA: 1 888 667 7839