Re: gEDA: gaf - Spice question

["Bas Gieltjes" <S_dot_Gieltjes-at-NOSPAMITS_dot_TUDelft_dot_nl>]

On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Chris Ellec wrote:

Hi Chris, Ales,

> Ales, how is that going to affect the rest of gaf, if any ? Does that
> mean that all the analog parts are not defined right for spice, since
> most of them have pinx=x ?
> 

Or even worse : those symbols are not created according to the `Master
Attribute list for gEDA (TXT)' file under the documentation section of the
geda site.  See the pin# section where it says:

"<snip>
All pins should have a pin#=# attribute attached to the pin object. 
The first # is a placeholder and increments sequentially starting at 1.
The second # is the actual pin number.  Both #'s are required!
The order of pin#'s is significant since the netlister will output pins
in sequential order starting at pin1 going through pinN. Example: pin1=1,
pin2=2, pin3=5.  <snip>" 

 Bas
--