geda-dev Mailing List Archive (by thread)
- Re: gEDA: gEDA/gaf 20020825 source tarballs released
- gEDA: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020915
- Re: gEDA: gEDA/gaf 20020825 source tarballs released
- Re: gEDA: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020915
- From: Trevor John Williams
- Re: gEDA: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020915
- Re: gEDA: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020915
- From: Trevor John Williams
- gEDA: Re: gEDA-user: Iverilog support SWIFT models??
- From: Paul Michael Hartke
- Re: gEDA: Re: gEDA-user: Iverilog support SWIFT models??
- gEDA: Re: gEDA-user: Iverilog support SWIFT models??
- gEDA: Re: gEDA-user: Iverilog support SWIFT models??
- Re: gEDA: Re: gEDA-user: Iverilog support SWIFT models??
- Re: gEDA: Re: gEDA-user: Iverilog support SWIFT models??
- Re: gEDA: Re: gEDA-user: Iverilog support SWIFT models??
- Re: gEDA: Re: gEDA-user: Iverilog support SWIFT models??
- From: Paul Michael Hartke
- Re: gEDA: Re: gEDA-user: Iverilog support SWIFT models??
- gEDA: Little adjusts to i18n
- gEDA: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020921
- Re: gEDA: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020921
- Re: gEDA: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020921
- Re: gEDA: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020921
- gEDA: assertion failure in ivl:synth2.cc
- Re: gEDA: assertion failure in ivl:synth2.cc
- gEDA: footprint, file names and pin numbers
- gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: footprint, file names and pin numbers
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: footprint, file names and pin numbers
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- RE: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- gEDA: i18n: japanese translation, multi-byte char
- Re: gEDA: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020921
- gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020921
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- gEDA: case statement problem
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: i18n: japanese translation, multi-byte char
- Re: gEDA: i18n: german translation, automake question
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: gEDA/gaf 20020825 source tarballs released
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- gEDA: [crhalpin@students.wisc.edu: Bug#163167: verilog: does not correctly handle wires]
- gEDA: [crhalpin@students.wisc.edu: Bug#163167: test file and update]
- Re: gEDA: [crhalpin@students.wisc.edu: Bug#163167: verilog: does not correctly handle wires]
- gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need generic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: gEDA: gtag?
- From: Winefred Washington
- RE: gEDA: gtag?
- gEDA: Updates to sarlacc_sym and sarlacc_scheme
- gEDA: Spec-file for "pcb"
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need generic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need generic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need generic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- RE: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need generic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- gEDA: Trivial patch for missing standard attribute names
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: gEDA: Updates to sarlacc_sym and sarlacc_scheme
- Re: gEDA: Updates to sarlacc_sym and sarlacc_scheme
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: gEDA: Trivial patch for missing standard attribute names
- gEDA: Minor itch with make gschem
- Re: gEDA: Trivial patch for missing standard attribute names
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need generic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: gEDA: Trivial patch for missing standard attribute names
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- gEDA: gEDA RPMs and RedHat8
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need generic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Hierarchies (Was: gEDA: Updates to sarlacc_sym and sarlacc_scheme)
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- gEDA: FAQ moving -- Wiki ?
- Re: Hierarchies (Was: gEDA: Updates to sarlacc_sym and sarlacc_scheme)
- Re: gEDA: gEDA RPMs and RedHat8
- Re: gEDA: Minor itch with make gschem
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need generic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: Hierarchies (Was: gEDA: Updates to sarlacc_sym and sarlacc_scheme)
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- RE: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: gEDA: gEDA RPMs and RedHat8
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- gEDA: norms compliant symbols project
- RE: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- gEDA: Patch to pålay with busses
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]
- gEDA-user: Open-source cores provide new paths to SoCs
- From: Paul Michael Hartke
- Re: gEDA: Open-source cores provide new paths to SoCs
- RE: gEDA: gtag?
- Re: gEDA: Patch to play with busses
- Re: gEDA: norms compliant symbols project
- gEDA: IEEE Symbol Library
- gEDA-user: Ann: gerbv-0.0.10 released
- Re: gEDA: Ann: gerbv-0.0.10 released
- Re: gEDA: Ann: gerbv-0.0.10 released
- Re: gEDA: Ann: gerbv-0.0.10 released
- gtkglarea was: Re: gEDA: Ann: gerbv-0.0.10 released
- gEDA: Signs - gate-level logic synthesis, analysis and simulation based on a VHDL subset
- Re: gEDA: Ann: gerbv-0.0.10 released
- gEDA: new Savant prerelease available
- Re: gEDA: Ann: gerbv-0.0.10 released
- gEDA: dvips vz. dvi2ps
- gEDA: Release 20021016 of pcisim
- gEDA: While we are waiting for gpcb: PCB made compatible with gEDA
- gEDA: Suggestion for standardized footprint names and use
- Re: gEDA: While we are waiting for gpcb: PCB made compatible withgEDA
- Re: gEDA: Suggestion for standardized footprint names and use
- Re: gEDA: Suggestion for standardized footprint names and use
- gEDA: [GerhardTonn@swol.de: Bug#165052: wrong assumption on char signedness]
- Re: gEDA: While we are waiting for gpcb: PCB made compatible withgEDA
- Re: gEDA: While we are waiting for gpcb: PCB made compatible with gEDA
- Re: gEDA: While we are waiting for gpcb: PCB made compatible with gEDA
- Re: gEDA: While we are waiting for gpcb: PCB made compatible with gEDA
- Re: gEDA: While we are waiting for gpcb: PCB made compatible with gEDA
- Re: gEDA: While we are waiting for gpcb: PCB made compatible with gEDA
- gEDA: Compile Problems: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020921
- Re: gEDA: Compile Problems: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020921
- Re: gEDA: While we are waiting for gpcb: PCB made compatible with gEDA
- Re: gEDA: Compile Problems: Icarus Verilog Snapshot 20020921
- Re: gEDA: While we are waiting for gpcb: PCB made compatible with gEDA
- gEDA: Segmentation guard
- debian gerbv bugs Re: gEDA: [GerhardTonn@swol.de: Bug#165052: wrongassumption on char signedness]
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.4