Re: gEDA: [blarson@blars.org: Bug#163584: geda-gschem: need gener ic transistors, component scale, lable orientation]

[Antonio A Todo Bom <antonio-at-NOSPAMprojetos_dot_etc_dot_br>]

No dia (On:) Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:01:12 +0200 (CEST)
Egil Kvaleberg <egil@kvaleberg.no> escreveu: (wrote:)

> Been there, done that. A3 on screen, A4 on paper, whats the problem?
> 
> The thing I don't understand is that there is a *scale* issue on a
> schematic. If there is, I would prefer staying ignorant.
> 
> Presumably, anyone concerned about the standard symbols being too large
> can just spend an hour or so writing a script that scales their personal
> copy of the symbols to whatever size they prefer.
> 
> End of discussion, at least from my side. 
> 

	No, I think that this discussion is very important to the project. You are not been boring with this, your opinion is a valid to many people. But what we are saying is that in our professional actuacion we cannot use any metrics, we NEED to be completly norms compliant.
	In a industry, all the draws need to folow a single aspect to be understood for any technical area. And the way to do it is following international norms.

	We are talking about a source code project, and our target is exactly do not cause problems to actual gEDA lib. We are talking about to create a new lib completly norms compliant. It may be downloaded separated or not.

	About consistence, yes this important, but the norms cover this subject too. They say about how to write footprint atributes, electrical conection etc...

Best regards,

Antonio Augusto Todo Bom Neto
LAX Eletronica e Telecomunicacoes Ltda
gEDA-BR - Users Group - http://gedabr.projetos.etc.br