[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic (long)

To: geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
Subject: RE: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic (long)
From: Xtian Xultz <xultz-at-NOSPAMprojetos_dot_etc_dot_br>
Date: 22 Nov 2002 21:29:31 -0200
Delivery-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:28:10 -0500
In-Reply-To: <AFA2797FA126FD46B8CD281F2809844E0197CB@taurus.primary.local>
Organization: LAX
References: <AFA2797FA126FD46B8CD281F2809844E0197CB@taurus.primary.local>
Reply-To: geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
Sender: owner-geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org

Hi dude!

Just for curiosity, but why dont you use the OrCAD pcb tool?
I used before, and to me its a great tool


> Now I'm at a company that uses point tools to do PCBs.  We use a schematic editor (orcad) to do schematics 
> and a separate tool to do PCB layout.  The tools communicate via netlist and a back annotation file ant
>  the end of the design cycle.  I dislike this flow intensely and I'm serious looking a gschem (and maybe Lasagne!) s an alternative.

References:
- RE: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic (long)
  - From: Keith Outwater

Prev by Date: Re: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic - more ramblings
Next by Date: RE: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic (OT)
Prev by thread: Re: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic (long)
Next by thread: Re: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread