[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic

To: geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
Subject: Re: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic
From: Wojciech Kazubski <wk-at-NOSPAMire_dot_pw_dot_edu_dot_pl>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:32:41 +0100
Delivery-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 08:29:43 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20021123.074213.08322152.cfmd@swipnet.se>
References: <20021122174413.GA12384@janus.phy.bris.ac.uk> <1037992223.26099.33.camel@beta.kvaleberg.no> <20021123.074213.08322152.cfmd@swipnet.se>
Reply-To: geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
Sender: owner-geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3

Hi Andres and all!

The schematic capture (gschem) and PCB progeam should be separate.

I would like a possibilty to make footprint symbols containing net segments 
(not only pads).
I am an RF engineer and I need this to make printed inductors, couplers etc.

W. Kazubski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic
  - From: Charles Lepple
- gEDA: pcell support for RF structures in PCB layout
  - From: mcmahill
- Re: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic
  - From: Major A

References:
- gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic
  - From: Major A
- Re: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic
  - From: Egil Kvaleberg
- Re: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic
  - From: Magnus Danielson

Prev by Date: Re: gEDA: Re: gEDA-user: Ann: gerbv 0.11 released
Next by Date: Re: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic
Prev by thread: Re: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic
Next by thread: Re: gEDA: design decisions: PCB<->schematic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread