Re: gEDA: PINSEQ attribute

[Ales Hvezda <ahvezda-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org>]

Hi,

>
>I've been hacking the SPICE netlister, and found a little buglet in
>gsymcheck.  I was having a problem where gnetlist:get-nets returned
>"ERROR_INVALID_PIN" for a particular symbol.  Upon investigation, it
>turned out that the symbol's PINSEQ attributes did not start at 1, and
>they had a gap in the numbering sequence too. 
>
>I ran gsymcheck on the symbol, and it passed.  This is an oversight in
>the functionality of gsymcheck -- apparently it doesn't check the
>PINSEQ attributes for validity.  If there is interest, I can try to
>look into this further, but I figured that it was better to bring this
>buglet to the attention of the project leaders before I ran off trying
>to fix gsymcheck. 


	Yeah, this is an oversight in gsymcheck, however Werner Hoch has
filed a bug so this problem will not be forgotten.  Please see bug #36,
in http://www.geda.seul.org/bugs.html

Point #4 of this bug report is similar and the error you pointed out
will be caught once this error condition is checked for.


								-Ales