Re: gEDA: a_basic.nw problems

[Ales Hvezda <ahvezda-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org>]

Hi,

[snip]
>I also cannot see, why there are two, almost identical functions and 
>would try to change the code, that there will only be one function, 
>which saves all the data. I also would like to change the functions 
>like o_complex_save() o take a FILE* as their first argument instead of 
>a buffer. The buffer approach need some management to be sure, no 
>buffer overflow problem occurs.


	Yeah, there's a little redundancy.  o_save and o_save_embedded
could be merged into one function.  


>However, I am new to geda, so I do not know, how to introduce these 
>changes.


	Send me a patch and I'll integrate the change into CVS.
Thanks.

								-Ales