[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA: Comments request
Hi!
Am 23.10.2005 um 15:15 schrieb Werner Hoch:
>> - Attributes for packaging/automated refdes assignation: currently
>> if you want to use an heterogeneus part, you have to assign the same
>> refdes to the symbols by hand. I'd prefer to assing some attribute
>> which tells gschem/gannotate that those symbols should be in the same
>> physical part, and if there can be another symbols automatically
>> packaged into that part or not (maybe another attribute). It's like a
>> "part set": if two symbols have the same part set, they should have
>> the same refdes. Maybe this "part set" attribute can be like a
>> description (I won't like it to be just a number, since I want to
>> reuse a schematic across projects, and I don't want to track the
>> numbers myself) added by the user, and the annotation utility should
>> be aware of these special ones.
>
> Sound good and hard to code ;-).
What about the eagle invoke approach?
Each symbol could have an attribute attached which explains what other
symbols are bundled with this symbol in a physical device.
A 7400 quad nand gate could carry an attribute explaining, that is
consists of 4 and gates and one pair of power supply pins.
This is, of course, incompatible with lightwight symbols, but fits
nicely into a hierarchical symbol scheme.
73, Mario
--
Mario Klebsch mario@klebsch.de
PGP-Key available at http://www.klebsch.de/public.key
Fingerprint DSS: EE7C DBCC D9C8 5DC1 D4DB 1483 30CE 9FB2 A047 9CE0
Diffie-Hellman: D447 4ED6 8A10 2C65 C5E5 8B98 9464 53FF 9382 F518