[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA: GTKwave status

To: geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
Subject: Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+geda-at-NOSPAMmega-nerd_dot_com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:46:21 +1100
Delivery-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 03:46:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20060307081809.1379.qmail@web32712.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Organization: Erik Conspiracy Secret Labs
References: <Pine.LNX.4.32.0603041535340.16639-100000@localhost.localdomain><20060307081809.1379.qmail@web32712.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Reply-To: geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
Sender: owner-geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org

Tim Freedom wrote:

> Great idea - didn't think of that.  Do please seriously consider moving
> in this direction sooner rather then later to put an end to this entire
> "what is the latest version" mess.  I'd suggest simply releasing what
> you have now as 3.0 to make a clean break/start.

Yep, this is definitely the best solution.

Erik
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
  Erik de Castro Lopo
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"C++ has its place in the history of programming languages. Just
as Caligula has his place in the history of the Roman Empire."
-- Robert Firth

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
  - From: Anthony J Bybell

References:
- Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
  - From: Anthony J Bybell
- Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
  - From: Tim Freedom

Prev by Date: Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
Next by Date: Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
Prev by thread: Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
Next by thread: Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread