[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA: GTKwave status

To: <geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org>
Subject: Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
From: Anthony J Bybell <netracurse-at-NOSPAMnc_dot_rr_dot_com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:49:39 -0500 (EST)
Delivery-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 09:50:27 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20060307194621.330f62aa.mle+geda@mega-nerd.com>
Reply-To: geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
Sender: owner-geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:

> Tim Freedom wrote:
>
> > Great idea - didn't think of that.  Do please seriously consider moving
> > in this direction sooner rather then later to put an end to this entire
> > "what is the latest version" mess.  I'd suggest simply releasing what
> > you have now as 3.0 to make a clean break/start.
>
> Yep, this is definitely the best solution.

OK, next release will be 3.0.0.  I'll probably have to do an announce on
the newsgroups as people will wonder where 3.0 came from.  =)

-Tony

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
  - From: Erik de Castro Lopo

References:
- Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
  - From: Erik de Castro Lopo

Prev by Date: Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
Next by Date: Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
Prev by thread: Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
Next by thread: Re: gEDA: GTKwave status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread