Re: gEDA-dev: Re: [Gnucap-devel] Gnucap docs build failure on FC5(and other places)

[Dan McMahill <dan-at-NOSPAMmcmahill_dot_net>]

Stephen Williams wrote:
> al davis wrote:
> 
> 
>>There is a real need for a high quality replacement for 
>>autoconf.  
> 
> 
> I've had the name "CMake" wispered in my ear once or twice, and
> I've been considering looking into it. Apparently, some groups
> find it to be superior to autoconf, but I have no idea what I
> think of it, since I haven't look at it yet.

ack.  I'll believe its better when I see it actually working on lots of 
platforms.  Not saying it isn't but it surely is not as widely deployed 
as autoconf/automake.

-Dan


_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev