[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-dev: Re: gEDA: gd instead of libgdeda
Hi all,
thanks for fixing this.
Regards,
Carlos
El sáb, 23-09-2006 a las 09:09 -0400, Dan McMahill escribió:
> Patrick Bernaud wrote:
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > Carlos Nieves Ónega writes:
> > > [...]
> > > I got some time to get into this, so I changed libgeda and gschem to use
> > > libgd instead of libgdgeda, and removed any reference to libgdgeda.
> > >
> >
> > There is a problem in the configure script of gschem: the test for
> > libgd is too basic and will always result in a false positive of libgd
> > availability.
> >
> > The reason: 'gd' is in 'gdk' and gdk is part of libgeda's dependencies
> > and therefore appears in LIBGEDA_LIBS. I have no idea on how to
> > improve this detection though.
>
> borrow the configure.ac bit from pcb which detects gd. I think the
> issues from early on are ironed out with it.
>
_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev