[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

gEDA-dev: DBUS binding to PCB actions

To: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org>
Subject: gEDA-dev: DBUS binding to PCB actions
From: Peter Clifton <pcjc2-at-NOSPAMcam_dot_ac_dot_uk>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:42:21 +0100
Delivery-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 09:42:30 -0400
List-Archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-dev>
List-Help: <mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-Id: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev.moria.seul.org>
List-Post: <mailto:geda-dev@moria.seul.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev>,<mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev>,<mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-To: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org>
Sender: geda-dev-bounces-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org

Hi,

A minor bug fix to the D-Bus bindings later, and the following patch is
what should get applied against CVS.

One downside, is that it uses GNU_SORUCE, so will require GNU LIBC for
the D-Bus stuff to compile. OTOH, the D-Bus code is optional
at ./configure time, and disabled by default, so I don't see why it
can't go in.


Peter C.




_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-dev: DBUS binding to PCB actions
  - From: Peter Clifton
- Re: gEDA-dev: DBUS binding to PCB actions
  - From: Dan McMahill

Prev by Date: gEDA-dev: Gtk warning from new component selector
Next by Date: Re: gEDA-dev: DBUS binding to PCB actions
Prev by thread: Re: gEDA-dev: Gtk warning from new component selector
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-dev: DBUS binding to PCB actions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread