[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-dev: pcb and -rdynamic

To: geda-dev-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org
Subject: Re: gEDA-dev: pcb and -rdynamic
From: DJ Delorie <dj-at-NOSPAMdelorie_dot_com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:23:36 -0400
Delivery-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:23:48 -0400
In-reply-to: <45343B89.3060000@mcmahill.net> (message from Dan McMahill onMon, 16 Oct 2006 22:10:17 -0400)
List-Archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-dev>
List-Help: <mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-Id: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev.moria.seul.org>
List-Post: <mailto:geda-dev@moria.seul.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev>,<mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev>,<mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <45343B89.3060000@mcmahill.net>
Reply-To: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org>
Sender: geda-dev-bounces-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org


> Any suggestions on the right way to get the compiler specific flags 
> which are needed here?

The obvious thing is to check for -x on the output file.

The second choice is to bop the cc developers on their heads for not
failing on unknown options, and for producing a file yet not making it
executable, while still "succeeding".


_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-dev: pcb and -rdynamic
  - From: Dan McMahill

References:
- gEDA-dev: pcb and -rdynamic
  - From: Dan McMahill

Prev by Date: gEDA-dev: pcb and -rdynamic
Next by Date: Re: gEDA-dev: pcb and -rdynamic
Prev by thread: gEDA-dev: pcb and -rdynamic
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-dev: pcb and -rdynamic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread