[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-dev: Debian bug #400252 and #399455
Hi Ales,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 05:23:21PM -0500, Ales Hvezda wrote:
> It has come to my attention that there are two bugs filed against gEDA/gaf
> causing problems:
>
> #399455 FTBFS: fails to link, missing Build-Depends?
> and
> #400252 libgeda: links against libgd instead of against libgdgeda
>
> >From my point of view these are not bugs in gEDA/gaf. Yes, libgeda
> should be now linking against libgd and not libgdgeda. Libgdgeda should
> be removed from existance as it is no longer used by gEDA/gaf 20061020.
I agree. I believe the latest uploads should fix all of this (libgeda
20061020-3, geda-* 20061020-2).
> In the bug report there is one followup that puzzles me:
>
> > Subject: actually a bug in libgeda
> > This is actually a bug in libgeda; It seems libgeda is not build with
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > libgdgeda, but with libgd instead.
>
> How was this opinion formed? As far as I know, nobody on the gEDA/gaf
I think this means "the libgeda package" rather than geda-gattrib to
which #399455 is actually assigned.
I overlooked the gdgeda->gd change in the initial upload of the new
libgeda, which resulted in a big mess (partly because I still had
libgdgeda installed here). I think the latest upload will sort it out. I
hope it will get into etch, but the freeze is coming very soon.
thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev