[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH 1/4] Make the interface of o_selection_addmatch the other o_selection_*()

To: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org>
Subject: Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH 1/4] Make the interface of o_selection_addmatch the other o_selection_*()
From: Carlos Nieves Ónega <cnieves_dot_mail-at-NOSPAMgmail_dot_com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:09:28 +0100
Delivery-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:10:31 -0500
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;b=ZXketr6Q38jp6lYriD30A2TNOckOrm3bCr9i6wXRovA14aUcw1A4pY+cOwjze1d3QlC5WRfZFTjLENcgwS7yX5ss3NYpdCyohzVBBmSmJK9YPSrtOmqfX4swMt3+/DV8cFs8bTPz2A5Hh0xxXBTDvpWREFGDqMFXhywt04Z9QCk=
In-Reply-To: <200612190002.24293.peter@peter-b.co.uk>
List-Archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-dev>
List-Help: <mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-Id: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev.moria.seul.org>
List-Post: <mailto:geda-dev@moria.seul.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev>,<mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev>,<mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20061217193110.4126.34102.stgit@ptbb2.girton.cam.ac.uk><200612181815.15105.peter@peter-b.co.uk><1166481203.4235.34.camel@otilio><200612190002.24293.peter@peter-b.co.uk>
Reply-To: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org>
Sender: geda-dev-bounces-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org

El mar, 19-12-2006 a las 00:02 +0000, Peter TB Brett escribiÃ³:
> On Monday 18 December 2006 22:33, Carlos Nieves Ã“nega wrote:
> 
> > Agree. I wonder if just mark those functions as deprecated, or go ahead
> > and remove it from the headers. If no other application is using them, why
> > not make now remove it at once? what people think?
> 
> There are other uses of the functions within libgeda (although I'm not sure 
> there should be).  Is there a 'private' libgeda header that they could go in?

None I know about.

Carlos



_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev

References:
- Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH 1/4] Make the interface of o_selection_add matchthe other o_selection_*()
  - From: Peter TB Brett
- Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH 1/4] Make the interface of o_selection_addmatch the other o_selection_*()
  - From: Carlos Nieves Ónega
- Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH 1/4] Make the interface of o_selection_add matchthe other o_selection_*()
  - From: Peter TB Brett

Prev by Date: gEDA-dev: gedasymbolsui, version 1.2.0
Next by Date: gEDA-dev: Happy Holidays
Prev by thread: Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH 1/4] Make the interface of o_selection_add matchthe other o_selection_*()
Next by thread: gEDA-dev: [PATCH 4/4] Update the interface too_selection_print_all() to match other
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread