geda-dev Mailing List Archive (by thread)

• Thread Index

• Re: gEDA-dev: Electronic Engineering grade final work.
  • From: John Griessen
• gEDA-dev: gEDA + libglade
  • From: Felipe Balbi
• Re: gEDA-dev: Re: Bug reports for gattrib
  • From: Gabriel Paubert
• Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA + libglade
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA + libglade
  • From: Felipe Balbi
• Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA + libglade
  • From: Stuart Brorson
• Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA + libglade
  • From: Felipe Balbi
• Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA + libglade
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: Noscreen branch
  • From: Peter Clifton
• gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange
  • From: Sandy Thom
• Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange
  • From: al davis
• Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange
  • From: John Sheahan
• Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange
  • From: al davis
• Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange
  • From: al davis
• Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange
  • From: al davis
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Steve Meier
• gEDA-dev: Broken HTML on PCB downloads page
  • From: Peter TB Brett
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Steve Meier
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Griessen
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: L.J.H. Timmerman
• RE: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Timmerman, Bert
• RE: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Steve Meier
• RE: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: L.J.H. Timmerman
• gEDA-dev: g_smob.c is this used or is it dead wood?
  • From: Steve Meier
• Re: gEDA-dev: g_smob.c is this used or is it dead wood?
  • From: Carlos Nieves Ónega
• Re: gEDA-dev: g_smob.c is this used or is it dead wood?
  • From: Steve Meier
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Griessen
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Mike Jarabek
• gEDA-dev: Hierarchical (nested) buses
  • From: Peter Clifton
• gEDA-dev: Question for Peter about documentation pragma
  • From: Stuart Brorson
• Re: gEDA-dev: Question for Peter about documentation pragma
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: Question for Peter about documentation pragma
  • From: L.J.H. Timmerman
• Re: gEDA-dev: Question for Peter about documentation pragma
  • From: Carlos Nieves Ónega
• gEDA-dev: gschem component selector modification
  • From: Carlos Nieves Ónega
• Re: gEDA-dev: Hierarchical (nested) buses
  • From: John Griessen
• gEDA-dev: GSOC status?
  • From: John Griessen
• gEDA-dev: Re: GSOC status?
  • From: Stephen Williams
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Ales Hvezda
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Ales Hvezda
• Re: gEDA-dev: gschem component selector modification
  • From: Ales Hvezda
• Re: gEDA-dev: BUG in CVS gEDA/gaf
  • From: Ales Hvezda
• Re: gEDA-dev: New wiki page about data structure
  • From: Ales Hvezda
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: gschem component selector modification
  • From: Carlos Nieves Ónega
• gEDA-dev: net and buses netnames
  • From: Carlos Nieves Ónega
• Re: gEDA-dev: net and buses netnames
  • From: Ales Hvezda
• Re: gEDA-dev: net and buses netnames
  • From: al davis
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: evan foss
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Stuart Brorson
• Re: gEDA-dev: Hierarchical (nested) buses
  • From: evan foss
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: net and buses netnames
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: net and buses netnames
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Stuart Brorson
• Re: gEDA-dev: Hierarchical (nested) buses
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: Hierarchical (nested) buses
  • From: evan foss
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Griessen
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Griessen
• Re: gEDA-dev: Hierarchical (nested) buses
  • From: John Griessen
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Steve Meier
• gEDA-dev: Building pcb on OS X
  • From: Jon Schneider
• gEDA-dev: Icarus 64-bit?
  • From: Timothy Normand Miller
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Svenn Are Bjerkem
• Re: gEDA-dev: Icarus 64-bit?
  • From: Günter Dannoritzer
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Steve Meier
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Steve Meier
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Steve Meier
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Steve Meier
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: al davis
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Steve Meier
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: al davis
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: al davis
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: al davis
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Steve Meier
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Svenn Are Bjerkem
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Griessen
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: al davis
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: al davis
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  • From: Peter Clifton
• gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS
  • From: Dan McMahill
• gEDA-dev: Copyrights in gaf
  • From: Bernd Jendrissek
• Re: gEDA-dev: Copyrights in gaf
  • From: Ales Hvezda
• Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS
  • From: John Griessen
• Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS
  • From: Stephen Brickles using shaun
• Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS
  • From: Svenn Are Bjerkem
• gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS
  • From: Stephen Brickles using shaun
• Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS
  • From: Nathan Kohagen
• Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS
  • From: Kev Cameron
• gEDA-dev: Fix for bug #1612660
  • From: Peter Clifton
• gEDA-dev: Page creation cleanup - PATCH
  • From: Peter Clifton
• gEDA-dev: libgeda should it include the scheme interface?
  • From: Steve Meier
• Re: gEDA-dev: Building pcb on OS X
  • From: Ales Hvezda
• Re: gEDA-dev: libgeda should it include the scheme interface?
  • From: Ales Hvezda
• Re: gEDA-dev: Building pcb on OS X
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: Building pcb on OS X
  • From: John Doty
• gEDA-dev: missing #define HAVE_LOCALE_H, and gschem
  • From: Peter Clifton
• gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open)
  • From: Peter TB Brett
• Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open)
  • From: Stuart Brorson
• Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open)
  • From: Peter TB Brett
• gEDA-dev: SF.net RFE triage (23 open)
  • From: Peter TB Brett
• gEDA-dev: gEDA trackers
  • From: Peter TB Brett
• Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open)
  • From: Stuart Brorson
• Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open)
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: missing #define HAVE_LOCALE_H, and gschem
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open)
  • From: Dan McMahill
• Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA trackers
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open)
  • From: Ales Hvezda
• Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open)
  • From: Werner Hoch
• gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly
  • From: Bernd Jendrissek
• Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly
  • From: Peter TB Brett
• Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly
  • From: Peter Clifton
• Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly
  • From: Peter TB Brett
• gEDA-dev: XML format for circuit description
  • From: Cyril Giraudon
• Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly
  • From: Bernd Jendrissek
• Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly
  • From: Gabriel Paubert
• gEDA-dev: Re: Refdes renumbering (was SF.net patch status)
  • From: Rik
• gEDA-dev: [PATCH] Allow gschemdoc to access wiki pages with -w.
  • From: Peter TB Brett
• gEDA-dev: Re: Refdes renumbering (was SF.net patch status)
  • From: Levente