Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)

[Peter Clifton <pcjc2-at-NOSPAMcam_dot_ac_dot_uk>]

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 00:19 -0700, Steve Meier wrote:
> Peter,
> 
> I am re-visiting the concepts of hierarchy and pages. I was forced to
> since I started looking at the "hierarchy.c" file.
> 
> Do you think that the page structure should include a list pages that
> are one hierarchical level down? I think that this would allow the
> construction of hierarchical branches.
> 
> Steve Meier

You could make such a list, but it is similarly easy to infer it from
any "complex" objects belonging to the current page.

Of course, a "complex" doesn't necessarily map to just one page, so I'm
not sure exactly how it ought to be done.

This is one thing I'd like to have a better concept of in gschem +
libgeda - which files are pages of the same circuit?

Alternatively, we could extend the file-format slightly to allow
multiple pages per file (and make this the "official" way of defining a
"circuit").

Peter




_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev