[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

gEDA-dev: g_smob.c is this used or is it dead wood?

To: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org>
Subject: gEDA-dev: g_smob.c is this used or is it dead wood?
From: Steve Meier <smeier-at-NOSPAMalchemyresearch_dot_com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:34:39 -0700
Delivery-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:42:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1175791981.11804.97.camel@linux.site>
List-Archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-dev>
List-Help: <mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-Id: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev.moria.seul.org>
List-Post: <mailto:geda-dev@moria.seul.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev>,<mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev>,<mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1174529616.5557.1.camel@localhost><4601FB5A.6020101@alchemyresearch.com><46020408.3040302@alchemyresearch.com><1174557690.18781.10.camel@localhost><1174586260.25334.83.camel@linux.site><1174585339.18724.19.camel@localhost><1174663849.22815.7.camel@localhost><46135185.1080501@alchemyresearch.com><1175720108.712.4.camel@localhost><1175749585.21984.3.camel@steiger.localdomain><FBEBEA1168BDC14898C3BE263AB3C20957214D@IJMEXCMAIL02.ce.altis.corusgroup.com><1175791981.11804.97.camel@linux.site>
Reply-To: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org>
Sender: geda-dev-bounces-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org

Subject says it all.

Steve Meier



_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-dev: g_smob.c is this used or is it dead wood?
  - From: Carlos Nieves Ónega

References:
- Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  - From: Steve Meier
- Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  - From: Peter Clifton
- Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  - From: L.J.H. Timmerman
- RE: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  - From: Timmerman, Bert
- RE: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
  - From: Steve Meier

Prev by Date: Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
Next by Date: Re: gEDA-dev: g_smob.c is this used or is it dead wood?
Prev by thread: Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML)
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-dev: g_smob.c is this used or is it dead wood?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread