Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: gEDA-dev: Electronic Engineering grade final work., John Griessen
• gEDA-dev: gEDA + libglade, Felipe Balbi
  • Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA + libglade, Peter Clifton
    • Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA + libglade, Felipe Balbi
      • Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA + libglade, Peter Clifton
  • Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA + libglade, Stuart Brorson
    • Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA + libglade, Felipe Balbi
• Re: gEDA-dev: Re: Bug reports for gattrib, Gabriel Paubert
• Re: gEDA-dev: Noscreen branch, Peter Clifton
• gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange, Sandy Thom
  • Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange, al davis
    • Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange, John Sheahan
    • Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange, Peter Clifton
      • Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange, al davis
      • Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange, Peter Clifton
      • Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange, al davis
  • Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange, Peter Clifton
    • Re: gEDA-dev: VHDL Interchange, al davis
• Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Steve Meier
  • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Peter Clifton
    • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Peter Clifton
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Ales Hvezda
    • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Steve Meier
    • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Griessen
    • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), L.J.H. Timmerman
      • RE: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Timmerman, Bert
      • RE: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Steve Meier
      • RE: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Peter Clifton
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Peter Clifton
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), L.J.H. Timmerman
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Griessen
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Mike Jarabek
      • gEDA-dev: g_smob.c is this used or is it dead wood?, Steve Meier
      • Re: gEDA-dev: g_smob.c is this used or is it dead wood?, Carlos Nieves Ónega
      • Re: gEDA-dev: g_smob.c is this used or is it dead wood?, Steve Meier
    • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Ales Hvezda
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Dan McMahill
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), evan foss
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Stuart Brorson
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Dan McMahill
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Griessen
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Peter Clifton
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Stuart Brorson
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Griessen
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Dan McMahill
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Steve Meier
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Svenn Are Bjerkem
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Steve Meier
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Steve Meier
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), al davis
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Steve Meier
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), al davis
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), al davis
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), al davis
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), al davis
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), al davis
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Dan McMahill
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Dan McMahill
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Peter Clifton
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Griessen
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Dan McMahill
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Steve Meier
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Steve Meier
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Dan McMahill
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Steve Meier
      • Re: gEDA-dev: New diagram (attempt at UML), Svenn Are Bjerkem
• gEDA-dev: Broken HTML on PCB downloads page, Peter TB Brett
• gEDA-dev: Hierarchical (nested) buses, Peter Clifton
  • Re: gEDA-dev: Hierarchical (nested) buses, John Griessen
    • Re: gEDA-dev: Hierarchical (nested) buses, evan foss
      • Re: gEDA-dev: Hierarchical (nested) buses, Peter Clifton
      • Re: gEDA-dev: Hierarchical (nested) buses, evan foss
      • Re: gEDA-dev: Hierarchical (nested) buses, John Griessen
• gEDA-dev: Question for Peter about documentation pragma, Stuart Brorson
  • Re: gEDA-dev: Question for Peter about documentation pragma, Peter Clifton
    • Re: gEDA-dev: Question for Peter about documentation pragma, Carlos Nieves Ónega
  • Re: gEDA-dev: Question for Peter about documentation pragma, L.J.H. Timmerman
• gEDA-dev: gschem component selector modification, Carlos Nieves Ónega
  • Re: gEDA-dev: gschem component selector modification, Ales Hvezda
    • Re: gEDA-dev: gschem component selector modification, Carlos Nieves Ónega
• gEDA-dev: GSOC status?, John Griessen
  • gEDA-dev: Re: GSOC status?, Stephen Williams
• Re: gEDA-dev: BUG in CVS gEDA/gaf, Ales Hvezda
• Re: gEDA-dev: New wiki page about data structure, Ales Hvezda
• gEDA-dev: net and buses netnames, Carlos Nieves Ónega
  • Re: gEDA-dev: net and buses netnames, Ales Hvezda
    • Re: gEDA-dev: net and buses netnames, al davis
  • Re: gEDA-dev: net and buses netnames, Dan McMahill
  • Re: gEDA-dev: net and buses netnames, Peter Clifton
• gEDA-dev: Building pcb on OS X, Jon Schneider
  • Re: gEDA-dev: Building pcb on OS X, Ales Hvezda
  • Re: gEDA-dev: Building pcb on OS X, Dan McMahill
    • Re: gEDA-dev: Building pcb on OS X, John Doty
• gEDA-dev: Icarus 64-bit?, Timothy Normand Miller
  • Re: gEDA-dev: Icarus 64-bit?, Günter Dannoritzer
• gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS, Dan McMahill
  • Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS, John Doty
    • Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS, Dan McMahill
      • Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS, John Griessen
      • Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS, John Doty
      • Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS, Svenn Are Bjerkem
      • Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS, John Doty
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS, Stephen Brickles using shaun
    • gEDA-dev: libgeda should it include the scheme interface?, Steve Meier
      • Re: gEDA-dev: libgeda should it include the scheme interface?, Ales Hvezda
  • gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS, Stephen Brickles using shaun
    • Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS, Dan McMahill
      • Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS, Nathan Kohagen
    • Re: gEDA-dev: verilog-AMS, Kev Cameron
• gEDA-dev: Copyrights in gaf, Bernd Jendrissek
  • Re: gEDA-dev: Copyrights in gaf, Ales Hvezda
• gEDA-dev: Fix for bug #1612660, Peter Clifton
• gEDA-dev: Page creation cleanup - PATCH, Peter Clifton
• gEDA-dev: missing #define HAVE_LOCALE_H, and gschem, Peter Clifton
  • Re: gEDA-dev: missing #define HAVE_LOCALE_H, and gschem, Dan McMahill
• gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open), Peter TB Brett
  • Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open), Stuart Brorson
    • Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open), Peter TB Brett
      • Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open), Stuart Brorson
      • Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open), Dan McMahill
      • Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open), Ales Hvezda
    • Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open), Dan McMahill
  • Re: gEDA-dev: SF.net patch status (5 open), Werner Hoch
• gEDA-dev: SF.net RFE triage (23 open), Peter TB Brett
• gEDA-dev: gEDA trackers, Peter TB Brett
  • Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA trackers, Peter Clifton
• gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly, Bernd Jendrissek
  • Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly, Peter TB Brett
    • Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly, Peter Clifton
    • Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly, Peter Clifton
      • Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly, Peter TB Brett
      • Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly, Bernd Jendrissek
      • Re: gEDA-dev: [PATCH] PCB/gtk: Draw rotated arcs correctly, Gabriel Paubert
• gEDA-dev: XML format for circuit description, Cyril Giraudon
• gEDA-dev: Re: Refdes renumbering (was SF.net patch status), Rik
  • gEDA-dev: Re: Refdes renumbering (was SF.net patch status), Levente
• gEDA-dev: [PATCH] Allow gschemdoc to access wiki pages with -w., Peter TB Brett